Making Quality the Norm

Making Quality the Norm

bdFor our grandparents or great-grandparents, a visit to the doctor was a different experience than it is for us.  Certainly, the level of medical technology available today dwarfs that of long ago, but I believe there was another more fundamental difference: a century or so ago, neither doctors nor their patients were confident that the doctor’s treatment would actually work.  The practice of medicine was highly differentiated, with amateurs, quacks and professionals plying their trade to the general public. How was a patient to know which doctor could successfully treat them and which could not?

The establishment and maturation of the American Medical Association began to separate the good from the bad.  By setting professional standards and enforcing them through professional collaboration and statutory mandate, the practice of medicine has made amazing advances.  Today, we expect that doctors will be able to accurately diagnose most of our ills.  Because of the establishment and enforcement of professional standards, amateurs and quacks are no longer allowed to practice medicine; successful outcomes are the expected norm.

In 2004, the oldest charter schools in the country had existed for more than a decade. School districts, state education departments, universities and others were authorizing hundreds of more charter schools each year.  Who was doing this work well and who was doing it poorly?  How was one to know which authorizing practices were good or bad?

Ten years ago today, NACSA published the first set of Principles and Standards for Quality Charter School Authorizing.  They were developed after lengthy dialogue and work by authorizers, school operators and advocates across the country.  We were guided by a central question: which authorizer practices are most likely to lead to good schools for kids while also meeting the public’s expectations?

Practices that had been disparate across the country, like interviewing applicants, establishing performance contracts, and requiring annual audits, became standards for all.  At first, the standards were mostly informational and voluntary.  Over time, many states began to acknowledge the standards in law and require authorizers to follow them.  During the past decade, with input from authorizers, operators and advocates, NACSA has revisited and revised the standards three times. We will continue to do so as we all get smarter and better at this work.

Today, we pause briefly from that work to acknowledge this important 10-year anniversary, to complement the authorizing profession on the progress we have made, and to rededicate ourselves to continued improvement in pursuit of the day when all children will have the opportunity to attend a great school.

Happy Birthday Principles and Standards and may there be many more.


Most Recent Posts
No Shortcuts to Student Success: The Case for Statewide Annual Assessments
When I think about why I’ve dedicated my career to advancing and strengthening the ideas and practices of authorizing, I think about the students I’ve met over the years—bright, curious...
Raising the Bar: NACSA’s Updated State Policy Recommendations
NACSA believes that strong laws enable strong authorizing. In turn, strong authorizing leads to strong public education outcomes for students, families, and communities. That’s why we regularly update our state...
A New Path Forward: NACSA’s Bold New School Application Guidance
I’ll never forget a foundational principle I learned nearly two decades ago, while authorizing in Indianapolis: It should be hard to gain approval to start a new charter school. But...